Dispute Resolution in Public Procurement

Public procurement in Nepal is a critical component of public financial management, accounting for about 60% of the annual national budget. As the government continues to award contracts for infrastructure projects, services, and goods, public procurement disputes in Nepal have become a critical area of focus. With large-scale public contracts, disputes are inevitable, often arising from issues like bid rejection, non-compliance with tender requirements, delay in project execution, or contract termination. Resolving these disputes efficiently is essential for both contractors and government agencies to ensure the smooth execution of public projects.

The Public Procurement Act, 2063 and Public Procurement Regulation, 2064 serve as the backbone of Nepal’s procurement system, setting out clear legal framework for public procurement, including the steps to be taken in case of a dispute. Common public procurement disputes involve claims of unfair tender processes, ambiguous contract clauses, or disagreements over project timelines and specifications. Disputes can also arise during contract implementation, especially when contractors feel they have been unfairly treated or when public entities fail to meet their contractual obligations.

Effective resolution of procurement disputes is essential to maintain the integrity of public projects. In Nepal, several mechanisms are available for dispute resolution, including negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and litigation. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods, like arbitration, are often favored due to their cost-effectiveness and faster resolution, compared to court litigation. However, if the dispute cannot be resolved through ADR, it may escalate to court proceedings, where the Public Procurement Monitoring Office (PPMO) or related government authorities become involved.

Arbitration in public procurement disputes is particularly favored when the contract contains an arbitration clause. Nepal’s Arbitration Act 2055 facilitates this process, providing parties with a structured approach to resolving their conflicts. Litigation in public procurement cases, on the other hand, can be time-consuming and requires a deep understanding of both public procurement laws and the broader legal framework in Nepal.

Whether it’s resolving disputes over contract performance, addressing breaches of procurement regulations, handling project delays, negotiating with government agencies, representing clients in arbitration or litigation, having an experienced legal team by your side is crucial to protect your interests and ensure a fair outcome.

For those involved in public procurement disputes, A.H.N. Legal is the best law firm to contact. Our team of experts offers specialized knowledge in public procurement law, providing strategic dispute resolution services that ensure your rights are protected and your project stays on track. We also recognize the importance of proactive measures. From diligent contract drafting to advising on procurement compliance, AHN Legal is dedicated to helping you avoid disputes before they arise. In cases where disputes are unavoidable, we provide expert representation to achieve fair outcomes and ensure project continuity. With A.H.N. Legal, you're in the right hands to navigate even the most complex procurement disputes efficiently and effectively.

Please note that the above-mentioned is general information to help the reader understand the related laws in Nepal, and the same should not be construed as a legal opinion. For a detailed opinion or inquiry, please inquire:

Atit Babu Rijal
Partner, Attorney-at-law
+977-9851243536
atit@ahnlegal.com